Example of the use of Czech Trusts for Publicly Beneficial Purposes

1.4.2019

Svěřenské fondy a trusty s.r.o.today announced that on behalf of a client who wishes to remain anonymous, it has established a trust for the purpose of owning Io, the moon of Jupiter.  The moon will be held in perpetuity for the benefit of all mankind

Ima Dzoker, Director of Space Operations at  SFT said today “With the increasing threats to the continued existence of life on earth due to global warming, pollution, and conflict, it is wonderful to know that we, the human race, now have a backup plan”

The moon is now owned by the Io Sverensky Fond.  The Trust is a public benefit trust which, as well as providing our client with some interesting taxation benefits, means that the moon will be protected in perpetuity against misuse and exploitation.

In due course, SFT Spacelabs (an operating subsidiary of Svěřenské fondy a trusty s.r.o.) plans an exploratory mission to Io.  Their main objective for this launch will be the planting of a Czech flag on the surface of the moon.  “This will be an important step in legitimising and legalising our claim under international law” says Ms. Dzoker .

The exact date of the launch will depend on the success of a crowdfunding campaign through which the trust hopes to raise sufficient money to pay for the launch rocket.

It is truly gratifying to work with visionary clients who see the tremendous potential for using Trusts to help their fellow men.

Partnership with UNICEF Česká Republika during 2018

Last week we received a certificate of thanks for our partnership with UNICEF Czech Republic during 2018.  We received the certificate from UNICEF Ambassadors Patrik Eliáš, Jitka Čvančarová, and Bára Nesvadbová.
We were delighted to be able to support UNICEF, which does such a great job helping so many.
We also encourage our clients to nominate UNICEF and other charities as ‘beneficiaries of last resort’ when they set up their trusts.

Amusing and Positive things you can do with your trust – An example:

Dean Smith was a very successful and well-known coach of the University of North Carolina basketball team. During his career, he coached many successful teams and players including Michael Jordan.

Coach Smith is now also remembered for leaving a token of appreciation to former players. During his lifetime he established a trust. Amongst other things, his trust directed that, following his death, the trustees of his trust should send $200 to each of the players who played for him with the message to “enjoy a dinner out compliments of Coach Dean Smith.” Coach Smith died in 2015 and soon after that many former players received a letter in the mail which said:

“Each player was important and special to Coach Smith and when he prepared his estate plan, Coach (Smith) wanted to reach out to each of his lettermen. Accordingly, Coach directed that following his passing, each letterman be sent a two hundred dollar ($200.00) check with the message ‘enjoy dinner out compliments of Coach Dean Smith.’ Enclosed is a check in the amount of two hundred dollars ($200.00) with the notation ‘Dinner out.’

“Please enjoy your dinner out.”

Coach Smith’s gesture is a nice reminder of some of the more unusual things you can do with trusts, including providing happy surprises and fond memories

Upcoming APRSF Accreditation Seminar for Trustees and Advisers – 28. 2. – 1. 3. 2019

This is an intensive course suitable both for professionals who want to improve their ability to advise clients on trusts and also for people acting in the role of trustee.

The course provides an in-depth understanding of the structure, history and practical applications of Trusts in the Czech Republic as well as detailed coverage of the duties and obligations of trustees.

We will be presenting the seminar together with Deloitte and J & T Family Office.  The seminar is endorsed by and leads to APRSF accreditation.

If you are a trustee, then (depending on the wording of your trust documents), the costs of your participation can normally be covered by the Trust.

The seminar will be delivered in Czech in Prague 28 Feb – 1 Mar 2019.

If you are interested in the seminar please see the detailed information here.

If you wish to register for a seminar, please contact us at info@trusty.cz

Bad Reasons for Using a Trust

Over the last five years we have written many articles about the positive uses of trusts.

Trusts can be used to do many great things including;

  • solving inheritance problems – especially for ‘complicated families’
  • protecting children from others, and sometimes also from themselves
  • protecting family assets from business and other risks
  • owning family businesses
  • passing business smoothly from one generation to the next – avoiding family conflict and business disruption
  • caring for disabled children
  • charitable purposes
  • and many others

However, we thought it might also be helpful to make a list of things that trusts should not be used for.

We are prompted to do this partly to help remove some confusion about trusts, and partly also because we have noticed some people marketing trusts as offering benefits which in reality simply do not work.

So here is our list of things you should not use Czech trusts for:

 

1. Tax ‘Optimisation’

 

In many other countries trusts offer some very helpful tax benefits. In a few countries trusts are not taxed at all. In other countries, it is possible for example to use trusts to spread income around family members without actually paying it out. This means that you can take advantage of children’s lower tax rates to reduce the overall family tax burden.

None of these benefits apply in the Czech Republic.

There can be a few very small potential tax benefits associated with holding the shareholding of a family company through a trust, but these would only ever be an ‘extra positive’ rather than the main motivation for doing something.

What about using international trusts for tax optimisation? Generally speaking, this is quite complicated and expensive and for most people, it will deliver limited, if any, benefit. That is because most gains generated in the Czech Republic and all income received here will still be taxable here. In fact, if done incorrectly, using international trusts can sometimes deliver a far worse result than doing nothing.

 

2. Owning Investments

 

A number of financial advisers and others are suggesting that Czech Trusts are a good tool for holding investments (investment portfolios, investment real estate etc). This is not correct.

The reason is simple. If you own an investment asset directly, you will pay tax on your earnings from that investment at 15%. If you own the investment via a trust, the trust will pay 19% and then, when it distributes the money to you, you will pay another 15%. That comes to a total of 31.15%. (It is not 19% + 15% = 34% because the 15% is only charged on the net amount.

So, unless there are very compelling other reasons for setting up the trust, we don’t recommend using a Czech Trust for holding assets in this way.

Some companies are suggesting that you can place your investment assets in your trust but leave the returns from those investments outside the trust. Such strategies are potentially very risky for clients and run a high risk they could be considered tax avoidance or even tax evasion. If someone is trying to convince you that this strategy works, you should insist on seeing a written opinion from a tax adviser confirming that it is OK. If they cannot show it to you, walk away.

If your investment portfolio is substantial (meaning >20 million CZK) then in some circumstances it IS possible to implement a structure using international tools to hold your investments in trust. However, as we mentioned above, this will not reduce your tax to zero, but it will keep the tax to 15% when you receive the money. The reason for the 20 million limit is that the costs of setting up such a structure are quite high, and not justified for lower amounts.

 

3. Defrauding Creditors / Defrauding the ‘Future ex Wife’

 

As we frequently emphasise, one of the main benefits of trusts is that the assets you place in the trust are no longer yours.

This is very useful if, in the future, you come under personal financial attack from creditors or others. We strongly encourage people in high risk jobs (company directors, property developers, surgeons etc) to protect their families.

The important thing though is to set up the protection structure ‘while the sun is shining’. By setting up the trust, you are protecting your family against future risks and if a creditor decides to lend you money at a time when your trust already exists, he can hardly complain about it later.

However, if you wait until it’s ‘raining’ it will be too late to buy the umbrella. Czech insolvency law allows creditors and others to ignore transfers to trusts that happened (depending on the circumstances) in the last 2 or 5 years. In addition, any attempt to put assets into a trust in order to deliberately frustrate the interests of a creditor (or future ex-spouse) will also be set aside.

 

4. Stealing your sibling’s inheritance

 

We have seen some clients come to us with parents in tow, suggesting that a trust be established in order to make sure all the money goes to that child and not his or her siblings. This can sometimes be entirely fine, but it does sound a few alarm bells in our minds.

Trusts are a great tool for managing the inheritance process, but the trust must always be designed to reflect the true wishes of the founder (in this case the parent). If the parent wants to benefit one child at the expense of the others, that’s not a problem. There are many perfectly legitimate reasons why they might want to do this. However, what is important is that the parent is doing this because THEY WANT TO – not because they are being pressured to do so by children. In cases such as this, we always do our best to ensure that the parents are making their own decision and are not being pressured by children and that the reasons for their decision are logical, and fully documented.

If we are not satisfied that the parent properly understands the implications of what they are doing, or if we suspect there may be undue pressure applied to them, then we will refuse to help establish the trust.

 

5. Money Laundering / Tunnelling / Other Illegal purposes

 

We would not accept these people as clients as a matter of practice.

However, we also think they are like Unicorns. A lot of people talk about them, but we have never so far met any of them, and we’re not sure they even exist!

When trusts were first introduced into the Czech Civil Code, there was much discussion, including in the media, about possible or even probable misuse by criminal elements.

We like to liken this to frozen fish:

Frozen fish are highly dangerous and have the potential the potential to kill people if used as a weapon.

Therefore, we should ban frozen fish.

It is true that you could kill someone with a frozen fish*. But of course, this is a silly argument because it ignores the overwhelmingly positive benefits of frozen fish, and also the fact that there are many better ways of killing people than using frozen fish.

Trusts are the same. It is true that you can use Czech trusts to do illegal things, but why would you?

All the parties involved in a Czech Trust are completely transparent to the Czech State

The potential for personal liability and the level of personal responsibility (including criminal liability) placed on trustees is much higher than for companies

There are still, unfortunately, many better tools for doing illegal acts including offshore (and even Czech) companies.

So that’s a summary of some of the reasons for using a trust that just don’t work. There are probably others and we may add to this list in the future.

Like the frozen fish though, there are many many excellent reasons for using trusts, and as time passes people are becoming increasingly aware of them – as evidenced by the doubling of numbers of trusts in the last six months.

 


We carefully searched the internet and did not manage to find any actual examples of this (let us know if you do!). Frozen sausages have been used as a weapon (although not to kill). In Roald Dahl’s ‘Lamb to the Slaughter’ a woman killed her husband with a frozen leg of lamb and then cooked it and served it to the detective who came to investigate the crime.

Our Company in the News – January 2019

There has been considerable media interest in the dramatic (100%) increase in the number of trusts in the Czech Republic in the second half of 2018.

Trusts have also been in the news due to the ongoing discussions around Prime Minister, Andrej Babiš and his use of trusts.

Much of that media coverage features comments from our company and from members of our team. Some of it is featured here:

 

Svěřené Česko: tuzemští boháči se zbláznili do uklízení majetku

23 ledna 2019

Svěřené Česko: tuzemští boháči se zbláznili do uklízení majetku ● Tisk / Online ● Euro ● 23.1. 2019 ● Vydavatel: Mladá fronta a. s. ● Autor: Petr Weikert

 

Babiš jako reklama na svěřenské fondy. Zájem o ně v Česku rychle roste

17 ledna 2019

Babiš jako reklama na svěřenské fondy. Zájem o ně v Česku rychle roste ● Online ● Ekonom ● 17.1. 2019 ● Vydavatel: Economia, a.s. ● Autor: Jan Němec

Lidé si postupně uvědomují přínos a využití svěřenských fondů

14 ledna 2019

Lidé si postupně uvědomují přínos a využití svěřenských fondů ● Online ● Tyden.cz ● 13.1.2019 ● Vydavatel: Impression Media, s.r.o. ● Autor: ČTK

Svěřenských fondů výrazně přibývá, počátkem roku jich bylo 1369

14 ledna 2019

Svěřenských fondů výrazně přibývá, počátkem roku jich bylo 1369 ● Online ● Blesk.cz ● 13.1.2019 ● Vydavatel: CZECH NEWS CENTER a.s. ● Autor: ČTK

Svěřenských fondů výrazně přibývá, počátkem roku jich v Česku bylo už přes tisíc

14 ledna 2019

Svěřenských fondů výrazně přibývá, počátkem roku jich v Česku bylo už přes tisíc ● Online ● iROZHLAS.cz ● 13.1.2019 ● Vydavatel: Český rozhlas

Nejen Babiš. Svěřenských fondů výrazně přibývá. Řeší dědictví nebo nezodpovědné potomstvo

13 ledna 2019

Nejen Babiš. Svěřenských fondů výrazně přibývá. Řeší dědictví nebo nezodpovědné potomstvo ● Online ● Echo24.cz ● 13.1.2019 Vydavatel: ECHO MEDIA, A.S.

Svěřenských fondů výrazně přibývá, za půl roku jich vzniklo 829

08 ledna 2019

Svěřenských fondů výrazně přibývá, za půl roku jich vzniklo 829 ● Online ● Kurzy.cz ● 7. 1. 2019 ● Vydavatel: Kurzy.cz, spol. s r.o. ● Autor: Jiřina Kavková

Expat Inheritance Seminar for Democrats Abroad

In February, we will be running together with partners a seminar for expats in the Czech Republic.

The seminar will cover the key issues around inheritance and estate planning for expats living in the Czech Republic.

We encourage you to think about whether any of these things are true for you:

  1. I do not have a will
  2. I have a will, but it has not been updated since 2012
  3. I am married to a Czech (or I am a Czech married to an expat)
  4. He or she does not have an up-to-date will
  5. I have children from a previous relationship
  6. I own a business in the Czech Republic
  7. I own real estate in the Czech Republic
  8. I have children living outside the Czech Republic
  9. We do not have a coordinated plan for our family’s inheritance

If you are permanently resident in the Czech Republic and some of these things apply to you, it is a strong indication that you should seek advice – either by attending one of our seminars or contacting us for an individual consultation.

This seminar will be closed – and accessible only to members of Democrats Abroad.  However, we are always willing to run similar seminars for other groups.  For more information, email us at info@trusty.cz

New Article – Blind Trusts

Blind Trusts – What are they and how do they work?

 

Over the last few weeks there has been a lot of information in the media about blind trusts. Some of this commentary has been correct, and some has not. That’s why we thought it would be helpful to put together this article to explain what blind trusts are, and how they work.

 

The Problem.

 

Let’s take an imaginary politician who we will call Mrs Z. Mrs Z has an investment portfolio which includes investments in many different companies. One of those companies is the imaginary Czech Computer company, ABC a.s.

Mrs Z also happens to be the Minister of Education.

The Ministry has decided to order 10,000 new computers for Czech schools, and also decides to buy those computers from ABC a.s.. This is a big order, and it makes the share price of ABC go up. As a result, Mrs Z makes some money.

Even if Mrs Z wasn’t directly involved in the decision to buy the computers, the whole thing ‘smells bad’ because there is a conflict of interest. It is even worse if she was the person who made the decision. Of course, she will claim that she made the decision because it was the right decision and in the best interests of the ministry and the schools. But the problem is that the decision, even if the right one, benefits her personally.

If we look at the reason it ‘smells’ more closely:

  • Mrs Z knows that she owns the ABC shares. She knows that if she gives ABC the contract, she will benefit personally
  • Even worse, Mrs Z has ‘inside information’. She knows about the contract before it is announced to the public. She has control of her investment and so she could buy more ABC shares in advance of the public announcement, or sell her shares in DEF a.s. (another computer company) before the announcement

Of course, in most such cases, the politician involved has no such evil intent, but the fact that they know and control all their investments creates a bad perception and leads to questions being asked.

That’s the reason many politicians and others around the world use blind trusts – people like Theresa May, Prime Minister of the UK and former US President Barack Obama. Some Federal jobs in the US even require holders to establish a blind trust.

 

So, What is a Blind Trust?

 

A blind trust is a type of trust where the client (Mrs Z) puts her assets into the trust, where they are managed on her behalf. During the life of the trust, Mrs Z has no control and no knowledge of the assets in the trust or how they’re being managed.

An independent manager has full control of the trust assets and does not communicate with Mrs Z about what is being bought and sold within the trust.

Once Mrs Z retires from politics, the trust can end, and all the assets will be returned to her or her family.

 

How does it work?

 

Mrs Z sets up a trust.

Normally with a trust, the client has full information and a lot of control over the assets of the trust, but a blind trust is different. Here, the objective is to ensure that Mrs Z’s money is professionally and properly managed, in accordance with her goals and objective, but in such a way that:

  • She does not know what assets are in the trust
  • She has no control over the decision making or management of the trust

Mrs Z’s blind trust gives full control of the trust assets to an independent manager (Usually an investment manager or Private Bank). In addition, another company acts in a supervisory role, stepping into Mrs Z’s shoes to ensure that the money is being invested properly and in accordance with her objectives. The supervisor is also there to check the performance of the manager and has the ability to replace them if they perform poorly. Establishing a blind trust is not a DIY project; it requires experienced professional assistance.

During the establishment phase of the trust, Mrs Z has the ability to provide input such as what the investment objective of the trust will be. For example, should it be invested for growth, income or capital preservation? She also has the ability to provide a range for the asset allocation and to name the beneficiaries of the trust,”

After that, all communication between the Manager and Mrs Z ceases. In fact, there is a strict contractual provision prohibiting any such communication. It is also very important that the Managers are truly independent people (e.g. not golfing buddies) in order to prevent information ‘leakage’. The Manager reports its results and performance to the Supervisor in the normal way, and the Supervisor then in turn provides Mrs Z only with summary information regarding performance etc., but nothing that would in any way allow her to know what assets are being held on her behalf.

Blind trusts create a layer of separation between the client’s assets and political activities that helps to eliminate real or perceived conflicts of interest and accusations of wrongdoing.

Despite claims to the contrary, there is absolutely no reason that a blind trust structure cannot be created under CZ law.

 

What about Babis (and Trump)?

 

In the 21st century, we have opened the door to a new kind of leader – people like Babis and Trump – who are not just politicians but also the owners of large businesses.

There are many arguments about whether or not this is a good thing – we do not comment on this. However, what we can say is it makes the whole concept of conflict of interest more challenging.

In the past, our leaders were people who were not also business owners (May, Obama) or who sold out before taking office (George W Bush). For these people, blind trusts work really well.

However. for Babis and Trump, because of their businesses, they don’t work as well – but they are still better than nothing (or at least they could be if done correctly).

In both cases, they have transferred their businesses to trusts, so technically they are no longer the owners of the business – a (very small) step in the right direction. However, in both cases, the trusts seem to be largely pointless as they are not really blind .  .. more like ‘one eye closed, one eye open’ trusts.

Remember, our objective is to prevent conflict of interest in TWO ways;

First KNOWLEDGE: The Founder should not know what assets the trust contains. In the case of Mr Babis and Mr Trump this is, of course, a problem, one that’s impossible to solve even using a trust – because of course Mr Babis still knows that the Trust owns Agrofert. If Agrofert was to be sold it would be all over the media and he’d find out anyway, no matter how robust the trust was.

However, blind trusts can still be useful in relation to the second point (or at least they could be useful if they had been established correctly).

CONTROL: The Founder is not involved in decision making in relation to the assets of the trust. In this way, the Founder can focus on his or her role as a political leader and not be concerned with the running of the business. INDEPENDENT people run the business and make all decisions without informing or seeking input from the founder. This prevents conflict of interest because those making the decisions do not have the unique knowledge of the Founder. The decisions are made from business logic only, without any ‘inside’ knowledge.

However, . . .

Neither Babis nor Trump appear to have established their structures in a way that achieves this goal. That is because those actually running the businesses do not appear to be fully independent of the Founder, and in reality, it is reasonable to assume that the Founder still has a significant input into these decisions.

This lack of independence is the biggest problem and mean that in fact, they don’t have blind trusts at all – or at least not in their current form.