Article – Be Careful with Documents

Beware of Badly Drawn Documents

With the new trust law now ten months old, we are starting to see trusts being used, not just to test the concept, but to actively help clients solve their problems. This is a really positive development. The new Czech law is a good one and it helps solves many real problems for ordinary Czech people.

What’s not so good news is that due to inexperience, many (perhaps even most?) of the Czech Trusts established so far are fatally flawed.

Sometimes things can go wrong with trusts. No Trustee wants to end up in court facing claims from beneficiaries or others who are seeking to challenge the validity of a trust. Another difficulty can be when a problem comes up and the Trustee doesn’t know how to respond. Again, in this situation, a trip to court is often the only solution.

Thankfully in most common-law countries these experiences are few and far between! They do happen though and, based on our experience, they almost always happen because of badly-written trust documents. In the Czech Republic the potential for disaster is much much higher and so far many of the practitioners who have been preparing trusts seem entirely unaware if it.

In common-law countries we have hundreds of years of accumulated history and experience with trusts. More importantly, we also have extensive case law which sets out the guiding principles of trusts. In other words, the law of trusts is very detailed and comprehensive. One example is the current edition of The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations, a leading legal textbook on trusts written by Robert Pearce, John Stevens, and Warren Barr. This book has 1072 pages, and of course, that’s really just a summary of the key points of the law. Yet despite having access to this depth of detailed law, most common law trust professionals would not dream of establishing a trust with a trust deed shorter than twenty pages or so, and many are much longer.

This paper mountain isn’t simply based on lawyers’ built-in desire to produce long documents (long documents look more impressive and help justify higher legal fees!) Instead, all these pages of legalese are actually necessary. Even with 1072 pages of law to refer to, there are still very many ‘What if’ questions that need to be answered: What if a trustee dies? What if two trustees disagree? What if all the beneficiaries are killed in a plane crash? What if all the Trustees resign at the same time? What if a Trustee starts to act inappropriately? What if a trustee goes bankrupt? What if a beneficiary is bankrupt? What if all the trustees die in a plane crash? What if a beneficiary disagrees with a decision of a trustee? What if the founder changes his mind and wants some or all of the money back? What if the tax laws in the Czech Republic make having a trust too expensive etc etc etc.

Compare this with the situation in the Czech Republic where we have only 27 paragraphs of the Civil Code, and don’t have access to the 1072 pages of common law.

Reading the Civil Code tells us that it is possible to establish a Svěřensky fond with just two documents, a Trust Statue and a Contract, and both of these can be written on a single piece of A4 paper, and that’s the way that most Czech Trusts so far have been set up so far. But two pages of A4 is not enough to answer any of the ‘What if’ questions. In fact, the truth is that, in this country, because the Civil Code is so brief and because we have no case law to rely on, you need even more pages of documentation than in other countries.

Unfortunately that in turn means that many of the Trusts established so far are doomed to disaster. As soon as a ‘what if’ question becomes reality, these two-page trusts will end up in court. While this is probably actually good news, as it means that the Czech courts will rapidly gain some knowledge and experience with this new instrument, but it’s obviously not good news for the clients concerned.

Another factor that is critical in maintaining the integrity of trusts once they are set up it to ensure that the trust is properly and professionally administered – including the need for a Trust minute book, proper resolutions and processes for Trustee decisions. Any trust that’s run as some sort of offshoot of the Founder’s personal financial affairs is also probably doomed to fail.

There are some companies in the Czech Republic, ours included, that can prepare the documents properly. If you are considering setting up a trust, then be sure that your legal adviser knows what they are doing and if they present you with a two page document, then say ‘No Thank you”.

Article – Practical Uses of Trusts – Business Succession

Example of a positive use of Svěřenské fondy

Business succession

So much has been made of the (mostly imaginary) negative uses of Svěřenské fondy, the new institute introduced in the Czech Civil code, that their very many positive uses are often overlooked.

In this article we provide on example. Over the month ahead we will provide many more.

Let’s take an imaginary client: We’ll call him Marek.

Marek is a successful Czech entrepreneur who worked hard in the 90’s and is now the owner of a substantial and successful business of which he is justifiably proud. In addition, the business is a major employer and makes a very positive contribution to the Czech economy, especially in Marek’s home village where it has a factory which employs many local people.

Marek has two children. Let’s call them Hubert and Maximilian. Hubert believes he is a highly talented and clever businessman, but his track record so far has not been good, with almost every venture in which he has been involved failing. Marek is worried that if Hubert gets control of the company a similar outcome will ensue. In contrast Maximilian seems to be very astute and clever, but he is currently only 18 years old and lacks the experience he needs to take control of something as substantial as Marek’s company.

The problem is that Marek is getting older, and is starting to think about the future.

Until now, his choices have been limited.

He could of course sell the business, relax and enjoy his retirement – but for Marek this is not an attractive option. He invests considerable pride in his business and it would sadden him to see it in the hands of strangers who could well decide to merge his business with their other operations and even potentially shut down the factory in his home town.

He could pass the business on to his sons, but, for the reasons mentioned above, this doesn’t seem to be the right time, and in any case, this would invariably create conflict within the family.

Neither option really appeals

But now he has a new choice. Using a svěřenský fond he can now separate the ownership and control of his business. This means that until he retires, he retains full control and ownership of all aspects of the business, but that when he dies what passes to his sons will be only the ownership of the business, but not control. Control will instead remain in the hands of an independent Board of Directors, appointed by Marek who will continue to manage the company successfully and for the long term benefit of the shareholders. They will hand control on to the the children only if and when they are competent to recive it. This structure can also be designed to allow senior management of the company to take a more active role, including opportunities for equity participation – if that’s what Marek wants.

The end result of this structure means that the business will survive intact, Marek can enjoy his retirement in peace, family conflict is avoided, and perhaps most importantly, the jobs of the factory workers in Marek’s home town will be secure.

Creating this structure is relatively easy, but in order to ensure it is robust, it is absolutely essential that the documentation is drawn up by experienced professionals.

Of course this is only one of many positive uses of Trusts. We will be preparing more similar examples over coming months.